October 23rd, 2006, 8:41: TomGeneral
We now have a new location for this blog, on the main IH Barcelona site.

Click here to be redirected to the new Tech ELT blog...
August 12th, 2006, 9:35: TomBasic tools
Podcasting -- a portmanteau of the terms "iPod" and "broadcasting" -- involves publishing MP3 (audio) files on the Internet, downloading and listening to them.

It has become hugely popular [statistics from the BBC] and is one of the technologies we might consider using with language learners (though, says The Guardian, which also claims to have invented the word, it is "...still a format awaiting a purpose".

Where to begin
This short concise article on teachingenglish.org.uk is probably the easiest place to begin to form an overview of what podcasting involves.

What use could you make of podcasts with your learners? Techlearning.com explains How Educators Can Use This New Technology.

If you want more details, try Podsnapper's Beginner"s Guide to Podcasting How to Start Podcasting  (a 36-page pdf guide).

Where to find good podcasts
On Yahoo, as on other search engines, you can search for podcasts on a huge variety of topics.

You also have specialised podcasting portals like Podcastalley.com, where you can also search under different genres (including, eg., education) as well as seeing what's most popular.

The mainstream online media -- the New York Times, for example -- has also quickly picked up on the popularity of podcasts.

For more "general interest" podcasts, LifeHacker.com has an excellent article on where to find them.

Podcasts for English teachers and learners
For podcasts specifically for ELT, there are several places you could try:
More resources
On the "Podcasting ELT" Yahoo Group (join it, if you are interested in podcasting), you will find lots more links relating to podcasting.


August 11th, 2006, 8:37: TomMuddiest points
A number of the "muddiest points" from the session(s) on August 10 I've answered previously, so I will direct you to answers that you'll find here on this blog:
Most of these are in the "basic tools" category... which includes everything we looked at during the session in "Task 1". What's a category? See this post, which will help you find your way round the blog...

In a separate post, I've answered the question "Why bother with technology?"

And finally, someone wanted to know how to find things on Google. I would argue that they didn't mean Google, they meant finding things on the Internet...


August 11th, 2006, 8:01: TomGeneral
"Why bother?" It was one of the "muddiest points" from one of the sessions on August 10th (full list of MPs from the session). I assume that what was meant was "Why bother with using technology in the classroom?"

In the first place, it should be said that technology certainly can at times be a hassle -- setting things up, and getting them to work properly and booking equipment out and so on. You certainly do want to have your "Plan B" up your sleeve!

Secondly, I definitely wouldn't bother unless I was sure that my return on investment was going to be high. If, for the time the learners and the teacher spend on the technology, they don't learn more language than they would have otherwise, or develop their language skills more, then I wouldn't use technology.

So why and when would I bother?
First of all, I'd say that it's a question of thinking not "What am I going to do with the technology?" but "What are my learners going to do with the language?". If you've thought about it in those terms, you are off to a good start...

Among the other reasons why I would go to a certain amount of hassle:
  • Technology is exciting, especially to anyone below the age of about 25
  • Conversely, (course) books -- and teachers! -- are boring to many of the same age group
  • Technology allows you to create things, often from nothing -- a podcast or a creative writing project  or a PowerPoint presentation
  • Things like blogs and podcasts and chat and email allow you to communicate with other people, possibly natives
All of the above lead to greater motivation. "We created this!" "We did that!" "We succeeded!" "We talked to real English speakers and they understood us!" Those are powerful motivators -- none of which you normally get with a grammar exercise in a coursebook.

Does technology = more language learning? It's not such a straightforward equation. If your learners are more motivated, they will learn more.


August 10th, 2006, 13:51: TomGeneral
Hello and welcome if this is the first time you've been here.

This blog accompanies a session on technology on the CELTA course at International House Barcelona [website] and is intended to be used by trainees both on and after the course.

A couple of things to note about the blog:
  • On the right hand side, you have blue buttons which you can pull down. The first one, for example, allows you to get back to the start page if you get lost, to find out about me, and to search the blog.
  • The second "Join" button allows you to subscribe in various ways to this blog. "Don't search...," I always say "... have things come to you." Subscribing to things is one way to do just that.
  • The third "Categories" button allows you to navigate the blog by topic. Things are published on a blog chronologically (and you can navigate them that way via the "Archives"). If you are interested in one particular subject, pick your category. Pick "basic tools" if you want to find out more about some of the things we mentioned in class.
  • Pull down the "Links" button and you will get a list of all the links that appear on the handout from the session we had together.
Do feel free add comments on anything you read here. Alternatively, you can also contact me by mail.

Enjoy your teaching...!

August 8th, 2006, 8:13: TomIdeas I liked

To practise question forms, lateral thinking puzzles can be fun.

Example:

A man is replacing a wheel on his car, when he accidentally drops the four nuts used to hold the wheel on the car, and they fall into a deep drain, irretrievably lost. A passing girl offers him a solution which enables him to drive home. What is it? [Answer in "comments", below]

More: 101 lateral thinking puzzles

They make good classroom activities apart from anything else because your learners really want to form those questions!

I suggest you refuse to answer any questions that are incorrectly formed... ("Good question, but if you can correct it, I'll answer it...")

Note that lateral thinking puzzles tend to be a bit morbid (and death is a subject I think best avoided in a classroom). The ones here are bit less morbid.

August 3rd, 2006, 8:46: TomIdeas I liked

This one came from a back issue of the excellent ET Professional magazine (ET meaning English Teaching, that is):

This activity practises prepositions of place with elementary students. Put a bin on a chair and draw an imaginary line about ten feet away. The students stand behind the line and aim a stone into the bin. Points are then won for various positions: in the bin (20 points), on the chair (15 points), under the chair (10 points), next to, behind, etc.

I'd suggest that the point of the activity is to actually say the prepositions correctly -- you get the points for that, not for your ability to lob a stone into a bin!

You could have several chairs and a couple of bags to add further interest to it, and might want to replace the stone with a screwed-up piece of paper rather than a stone -- especially if the bin is a metal one and there's a class next door!

Sounds like a great activity for a summer camp, to me...

ETP [website] comes out six times a year and currently costs 25 GBP a year. There's always something of interest in it... Highly recommended.

August 2nd, 2006, 8:46: TomIdeas I liked
In the excellent Cambridge International Dictionary of English (one designed for learners), there is a neat little diagram explaining the prepositions, with each preposition plus a single arrow illustrating meaning...

With a group of design students (though you could surely do the same thing with any group), a colleague got them to "design" a similar diagram. As you can see above, one student turned the arrow into a matchstick man and added a paper bag or bags to illustrate the meaning (eg. the matchstick man climbing "into" or "out of" the bag).



July 26th, 2006, 20:49: TomIdeas I liked

Of course you could get your images off of Google-is-Evil (assuming that you don't mind a spot of stolen property, that is...)

But one problem with that is that Google has zero interest in the quality of the images... or in how much language you could get out of them.

An alternative soure are newspapers and magazines -- which do have a vested interest in presenting their readers with striking, interesting photos (including ads:..).

I habitually rip images out of the newspapers and magazines that are about to go in the recycled bin, and store and classify them in folders (in the image above, you can see my transport and sports folders)... just in case they might be useful in class one day...

July 24th, 2006, 9:21: TomUseful links
Do your teenagers play with their mobile phones in class...? Do your adults suddenly stand up in class and walk out, as whoever it is that's calling them is much more important than their English class...? As a teacher, do you hate mobile phones too...?

This article on Modern Foreign Language Environment [website] suggests ways in which you could make (profitable) use of mobile phones in the classroom...
July 20th, 2006, 8:42: TomIntro session
Some one asked the question after the session in July. No, text isn't really more important. Or necessarily more useful. I'd suggest that it depends...

I'd also suggest, however, that as teachers, we can easily fall into a number of traps.

We assume that (1) all pictures are intrinsically good, intrinsically useful to us when we are teaching language, and useful too to the people learning it. That's not true.

If it's a picture of a mobile phone, then it's not true: it's no more useful than actually reaching into your back pocket for the real thing (which would be a lot faster, for one thing). Or Zidane head-butting that Italian in the World Cup Final.... You just don't need that picture!

People also (2) waste a lot of time looking for, printing and photocopying images, when it in many cases it would be far quicker just to draw the picture on the board. You can't draw a picture of (say) a parrot? So, how about you imitate one...? (And which is more memorable -- a picture nicked off of Google, or your imitation...?)

It also sometimes worries me that if we spend hours looking for, finding and editing the material, we are (3) forgetting that it's not really the material that matters; what really matters is the interaction and the language the material leads to.

Spend less time on getting the material together and more on thinking about what the students are going to be doing... then you are heading for a successful language class.

Texts are important too!
Perhaps because we image pictures to be so important, it's easier (4) to overlook text. Text is important too -- apart from anything else because, in order for our learners to learn the language, they need to be "exposed" to, and have to "deal with", lots of examples of language in context, ie. texts.

And images as well!
Of course, you can find great pictures that will lead to a lot of language... But which of the two images below do you think you could get most out of...?


What does it "depend" on...?
As with all resources that we might be using in the classroom (whether technological or otherwise), it depends... on the amount of language (and response from, and interaction between our learners) that we are going to get out of the resources.

Where to find texts and images
See the "links" in the sidebar (right) to access the various sources you had on the handout from our session.

July 19th, 2006, 11:58: TomUseful links
We have Jan Mulder's neat little application on the desktops in the computer room at IH which allows you to write phonemic script. It's easy to download if you want to install it on your own PC.

But what if you don't know the phonemic script for a word, or aren't sure? A good dictionary should tell you, and online you can check it on dictionary.com, among other places.

July 19th, 2006, 8:38: TomIdeas I liked
This one came to my email inbox in the DevelopingTeachers.com "Weekly Teaching Tip" (details below). The original source is Jill Hadfield's Advanced Communication Games (Nelson, 1987), a collection of photocopiable speaking activites.

'Hard  Bargaining' involves getting the students to barter. Each student has a card and they have to negotiate with the other students in order to get what they need. An example card might be 'You have but don't need 10 sheep' and then 'You need 4 pigs' and each student has different things in each section.

Here the focus is on animals but a simple change to the cards can produce a lexical set that has been introduced that week for example. The students could be bartering with anything and reviewing whatever vocabulary you wish.

You can see the past tips on developingteachers.com. You can also sign up to receive them weekly in your mail box.

See also
In a previous post, there were other things that you can receive in your mailbox. "Don't search, have things come to you!" I always say.

June 27th, 2006, 8:29: TomMuddiest points
Maybe Google is Evil is the wrong verb form -- it's more a question that Google has become evil.

First, and from a practical point of view, it's (now) evil because we turn unthinkingly to it when in fact we would find better, more authoritative information somewhere else, and a lot faster: if it's something for your class, ask your tutor, or look in a book, or go not to a search engine like Google-is-Evil but to a portal like TeachingEnglish.org.uk.

So, to some extent, we've allowed it to become evil.

Apart from that, Google is Evil because it has become so important to businesses. As a result, businesses have stuffed the Internet with junk -- simply so that their websites turn up top in Google (and other search engine). So a lot of what appears "top" in Google is in fact junk. Look carefully at what sites appear in the top 20 or 30 results for any search that is of "commerical value" and you'll see what I mean. How many of those sites exist simply and solely to drive traffic to other sites...? A lot...!

And because Google earns so much of its rapidly increasing revenue (99%, according to some estimates) from advertising, and now has to answer to shareholders, does it care if its results are stuffed with crap? No -- Google is like television. TV stations really don't care that what they broadcast garbage, so long as their advertising revenue grows.

Also, Google deliberately sets out to pretend not to be Evil: "Do no Evil" is its corporate motto. You have to be deeply suspicious of a company that sets out to dupe its customers in that fashion. It also says that its mission is "organizing the world's information and making it universally accessible and useful": the first four words of that make me highly suspicious.

Google is Evil because it steals things from people -- from publishers and from anyone who owns a website, images for example.

Is Micro$oft Evil? Yes. Google is Evil for exactly the same reasons... and one additional reason: it deliberately seeks to con you into thinking that it is not.

"What is Evil?" I read someone saying the other day. "Evil is anything Google decides is Evil". Now that's worrying...!


June 16th, 2006, 16:11: TomMuddiest points
We had quite a lot of "muddiest points" from the two separate sessions today. I suppose that's inevitable (at least that's what I tell myself ,-)!, with technology being such a huge subject...

Now that in itself is one reason why, as a teacher, I'd use a blog -- the fact that it means that you can deal with more than what comes up in class, or deal more fully with what does, perhaps by providing links to relevant information...

But before I get carried away with blogs, I've divided today's points into two separate posts. First, below, we have the non-blog questions. And, in a separate post which follows this one, those relating to blogs.

You'll in fact find the answers to some of the doubts already here, so I'll merely provide the links to where you can find out more information on keyboard short cuts, podcasting and RSS.

There were three more muddiest points -- which I'll have to deal with later:

June 16th, 2006, 16:09: TomMuddiest points
... and then there were various "muddiest points" today regarding blogs and blogging...

Again, for some of these there were already answers on this blog, so I'll point you there for some of them:

How do you set up a blog?
There are lots of providers of blogging services, with Blogger.com being one of the best known. Here's how to set a blog up with Blogger; here's how to set a blog up at Zoomblog, which is what this blog uses; and here's a comparison of the two.

Note that if you're not that confident with technology, Blogger may prove just slightly easier for you.

If you want a really simple, really basic blog, then an alternative would be Yahoo 360º, for which you'd need a Yahoo account.

How blogging can be useful in English teaching
I'll point you to a previous post to answer the question what can you do with a blog? Under the "Blogs II" category (see below), you've also got some practical examples.

More about blogs and blogging
To learn more about the subject, look at the posts on this blog under two of the categories (see sidebar, right): "Blogs and blogging" and "Blogs II".

And one last muddiest point for today...
Why is blogging so cool and innovative?

June 16th, 2006, 16:04: TomBlogs+blogging
The question was in fact one of the muddiest points from the June 16 session: "Why is blogging so cool and innovative?"

They're not, is the simple answer to that... It's just that geeks like myself get very enthusiastic about their new toys and I think it's only right to treat what such people say with a healthy dose of scepticism....!

"Cool" and "innovative" are not words I'd apply to blogs and blogging, and I think that even if they were, that would be a very poor reason to use them in the language classroom.

My basic criteria for using any technology in the classroom would be (1) how much time is it going to take up, before, during and after class; and (2) what return am I going to get on my investment -- and more importantly what return are my learners going to get on the investment?

Because blogging is so easy to learn to do (as opposed to say, using an interactive whiteboard, or writing your own multimedia material) and because the return on the investment is high -- those are the reasons why I'd use a blog, not because it's cool.

If you want something that's cool, that has what we might call the "WOW! factor", try an interactive whiteboard. One of my colleagues here at IH uses one quite a lot, and says her teenagers all say "WOW!" or "Cool!" when she plays MP3 files on it, displays the lyrics, blanks out the lyrics and so on...

Blogging is not quite like that, though you could get into its cousin, podcasting, and then they could publish the MP3 files, and wouldn't that be cool!

Blogging has got more to do with creating something from nothing, collectively, and caring about it, and owning it, and belonging to it...

Oh dear, I'm getting over-enthusiastic about it again... And the doctor told me not to!

Of course, you could just get your students to write things on a bit of paper for you, and hand it in... But now that would not be cool -- or even vaguely interesting...



May 31st, 2006, 20:55: TomBlogs II
In today's session we are going to look first at what a blog is and what elements you normally would find on one.

Look at the following example blogs, and see if you can see what they have in common...

May 31st, 2006, 20:52: TomBlogs II
The muddiest points [ explanation ] from our special session on blogs and blogging, in which -- among other things -- we set up our own blogs...

Is a blog open to anyone? Can anyone post on a blog?
Well, that depends on what "settings" you choose for it.... Is your blog a private diary, perhaps one in which you reflect on your teaching? Is it intended for other people? Do you want those other people to be limited to your friends and family -- or is it for absolutely anyone out there in cyberspace...?

Likewise, if it is a blog you are using with a class, you might want to consider whether or not you want to protect their privacy or not (especially if they are youngish children).


If you have set your blog up at blogger.com (as we did today), you've got the "Basic" tab under "Settings" (shown above). Answering "No" to the question "Add your blog to our listings" gives you a certain amount of privacy. Someone would then need to know the address of your blog (you could give it to them), in order to be able to access it.


One of the other settings you might want to change is who can write comments on your blog. The "Comments" tab under "Settings" allows you three choices there (as shown above), and if you "enable comment moderation" (shown below), all comments will come to you first for approval, before they get published.


You might want to enable comment moderation, by the way, as otherwise -- especially on a public blog -- you will end up with "spam" (junk) comments.

Note that "only registered users" means anyone with a Blogger.com account. Personally, I choose "Anyone" for "Who can comment?" but then enable moderation.

More "muddiest points" from today's session...
  • What's a permalink?
  • Editing the links on a blog
  • The difference between a blog and a discussion board
The answers to these three questions are in separate posts, below...

May 31st, 2006, 20:29: TomBlogs II
More muddiest points from today's session...

What's a permalink?
If you know the URL (address) of a blog, you can go there and read it -- or at least you can go there and read the latest post(s) on it. However, you might want to be able to go not to the latest post but to a particular, earlier one. For that, you need the permalink -- the permanent one, that is, which isn't going to change.

On this blog, you will find that you can click the title of any post; doing that takes you to a new page, on which only that post (and any comments on it) appears. The title is thus, in effect, the permalink.

On Blogger.com, rather confusingly, the permalinks are in fact hidden in the time at which they were posted.

Typically, bloggers (people that blog, that is!), link to posts on other blogs -- and they want to link to that post, not the blog in general.